Skip to main content

LFM3-VL-2B

Liquid AIOpen WeightLFM Open License v1.0 · Commercial OK

Description

LFM3-VL-2B is Liquid AI's open-weight 1.92B vision-language model (1.73B LFM3 language model + new 164M in-house conv/attention vision encoder + 25M projector), released Oct 27, 2026 as part of the LFM3 family. Inputs: text, images, and video (first LFM vision model with video, sampled at 2 fps) at native resolution; text output. Reasons step by step before answering (thinking), with spatial/embodied reasoning and grounding aimed at robotics, plus document/OCR/chart and GUI understanding. 128K context; 16 languages. Vendor reports a 71.4 average across 62 vision benchmarks (vs 57.6 for LFM2.5-VL-3B). Not recommended for coding, multi-turn conversations, or complex reasoning per the model card. Hugging Face: LiquidAI/LFM3-VL-2B (+ GGUF, MLX, ONNX). License: LFM Open License v1.0. Catalog benches are the thinking-mode column from the model card table. No catalog id (recorded here only): SEED-Bench image 78.6, MM-Vet v1 57.4, PerceptionBench 37.1 (catalog id is Moonshot's internal benchmark), HR-Bench 8K 76.2, ZoomBench 62.6, V*Bench 86.4, CV-Bench 88.8, LogicVista 60.4, RefCOCO-M 95.2, Point-Bench 73.8, MindCube tiny 56.5, SAT 80.2, Where2Place 44.9, OpenEQA 76.3, VSI-Bench 63.1, ScreenSpot-v2 desktop/mobile/web 94.6/92.2/89.9, MMMB 85.2, Multilingual MMBench 83.6, MM-ToolSandbox 42.5. No gateway id or price at time of adding, so no provider row. Sources: https://huggingface.co/LiquidAI/LFM3-VL-2B · https://www.liquid.ai/blog/lfm3.

Release Date
2026-10-27
Parameters
1.9B
Context Length
—
Modalities
—

Capability Radar

70
general
0
coding
70
reasoning
43
scienceest.
49
agents
70
multimodal

Science is estimated from LLM Stats science scores or reasoning when no dedicated science benchmarks are available.

Rankings

Domain#RankScoreSource
Multimodal Ranking129
27.0
LS

Benchmark Scores (LLM Stats)

(LLM Stats (zeroeval))

General

MLVU-M71.3%SR

Math

MathVista-Mini84.2%SR
DynaMath79.2%SR
We-Math68.6%SR
MathVision51.6%SR

Multimodal

MM IF-Eval72.8%SR
VideoMME w/o sub.62.8%SR
VideoMMMU49.6%SR

Reasoning

ChartQAMasry et al. (2022)92.7%SR
CharXiv-D87.5%SR
CharXiv-R70.2%SR

Vision

DocVQADocVQA (2020)96.7%SR
CountBench0.93 / 100SR
RefCOCO-avg0.91 / 100SR
POPE88.7%SR
TextVQA87.9%SR
MME86.9%SR
OCRBench86.3%SR
InfoVQA86.2%SR
MMBench-V1.186.1%SR
EmbSpatialBench0.83 / 100SR
HR-Bench (4k)82.3%SR
RealWorldQA79.3%SR
MMStar74.4%SR
ActivityNet71.2%SR
BLINK71.1%SR
MVBench69.4%SR
VideoMME w sub.69.0%SR
MuirBench66.4%SR
Hallusion Bench65.6%SR
MotionBench64.0%SR
OCRBench-V2 (en)63.5%SR
RoboSpatialHome0.63 / 100SR
MMMU (val)55.7%SR
ScreenSpot Pro55.5%SR
MMVU52.9%SR
RefSpatialBench0.50 / 100SR
ERQA48.2%SR
MMMU-Pro45.7%SR
LVBench41.2%SR
SimpleVQA0.36 / 100SR

AA Evaluation Indices

(Artificial Analysis)

No AA evaluation data available

LLM Stats Category Scores

(LLM Stats (zeroeval))
Safety
90
Structured Output
80
Embodied
80
Image To Text
70
Math
70
Multimodal
70
Reasoning
70
Spatial Reasoning
70
General
70
Grounding
70
3d
70
Vision
70
Video
60
Healthcare
50
Long Context
40

Pricing

No pricing data available

Speed

No speed data available

Provider Price Ranking

No provider data available

External Sources