Skip to main content

Claude Fable 5

AnthropicClaudeProprietary

Description

Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's generally available deployment of the same underlying weights as the restricted Claude Mythos 5 model. Anthropic positions the model as a new capability tier above Opus: Mythos 5 is the unsafeguarded trusted-access configuration, while Fable 5 adds production safeguards for public use. The system card reports that Mythos 5 is Anthropic's most capable model to date, with state-of-the-art results across software engineering, long-context agentic tasks, vision, knowledge work, healthcare, cyber, and life-sciences evaluations; Fable 5 matches the underlying model where safeguards do not trigger and behaves closer to Claude Opus 4.8 in safeguarded domains. Fable-specific results include SWE-Bench Verified 95.0%, SWE-Bench Pro 80.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1 84.3% mean reward with 20.9% of trials hitting a safety fallback, OSWorld-Verified 85.0%, FrontierCode Diamond 29.3%, FrontierCode Main 46.3%, GDPval-AA 1932 Elo, GDP.pdf 29.8%, Blueprint-Bench 2 38.6%, and AutomationBench 17.4%. Fable 5 uses classifiers for cybersecurity, biology and chemistry, and distillation attempts; in Claude client apps these requests fall back to the latest Claude Opus model, while the Messages API blocks by default unless developers implement or opt into fallback. Separate competitive-use safeguards target frontier LLM development work and are estimated by Anthropic to affect about 0.03% of traffic. The model was trained on a proprietary mix of public web data, public and private datasets, and synthetic data. Anthropic prices Fable 5 at $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens, and exposes it through the Claude API as `claude-fable-5`.

Release Date
2026-06-09
Parameters
Context Length
1.0M
Modalities
image, pdf, text

Capability Radar

100
general
70
coding
70
reasoning
60
scienceest.
50
agents
70
multimodal

Science uses a reasoning proxy when dedicated science benchmarks are unavailable.

Rankings

Domain#RankScoreSource
Agentic Capability3
82.0
LS
Math Reasoning3
96.0
LB
Reasoning6
90.0
LB

Benchmark Scores (LLM Stats)

(LLM Stats (zeroeval))

Agents

GDPval-AA1815.00 / 3000
FrontierSWE90.0%
OSWorld-Verified85.0%SR
Terminal-Bench 2.184.3%SR
SWE-Bench ProPrinceton NLP (2024)80.0%SR
ExploitBench78.0%SR
DeepSWE 1.170.0%
Finance Agent v256.3%
FrontierCode 1.153.5%
FrontierCode46.3%SR
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%SR
AutomationBench17.4%SR
Legal Agent Benchmark13.3%SR

Biology

BioMysteryBench46.1%SR

Code

SWE-Bench Verified95.0%SR

General

LiveBench78.3%
GDP.pdf29.8%SR

Healthcare

HealthBench Professional66.0%SR

Math

Humanity's Last Exam64.5%SR

AA Evaluation Indices

(Artificial Analysis)

No AA evaluation data available

LLM Stats Category Scores

(LLM Stats (zeroeval))
Finance
100
Legal
100
Reasoning
100
Agents
100
General
100
Frontend Development
90
Safety
80
Math
70
Healthcare
70
Code
70
Multimodal
60
Vision
60
Tool Calling
50

Pricing

Input Price$0.00001 / 1M tokens
Output Price$0.00005 / 1M tokens
Blended Price (3:1)$0.00002 / 1M tokens
Cache Read Price$1 / 1M tokens
Cache Write Price$12.5 / 1M tokens

Speed

No speed data available

Provider Price Ranking

Provider Price Ranking

11 providers

Cheapest: AnthropicMost Expensive: Venice AI
ProviderInputOutput
1AnthropicPRIMARY
$0.00001
$0.00005
2Xpersona
$3
$18.5
3Abacus
$10
$50
4GitHub Copilot
$10
$50
5OpenCode Zen
$10
$50
6LLM Gateway
$10
$50
7Azure
$10
$50
8FreeModel
$10
$50
9Modelis
$10
$50
10AIHubMix
$11
$55
11Venice AI
$12
$60

Compare pricing across different API providers for this model.

External Sources