Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning)
AnthropicClaudeProprietary
Descripción
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic's fastest, most cost-efficient model, matching Sonnet 4's performance on coding, computer use, and agent tasks. It offers similar performance to Sonnet 4 at one-third the cost and more than twice the speed, making it ideal for high-volume, latency-sensitive applications and multi-agent orchestration.
Fecha de lanzamiento
2025-10-15
Parámetros
—
Longitud del contexto
200K
Modalidades
image, pdf, text
Radar de capacidades
33
general
51
coding
43
reasoning
46
science
80
agents
80
multimodal
Rankings
| Dominio | #Posición | Puntuación | Fuente |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacidad agéntica | 87 | 38.0 | LS |
| Ranking de codificación | 292 | 51.0 | AA |
| Ranking general | 307 | 42.0 | AA |
| Ranking multimodal | 80 | 51.0 | LS |
| Ciencia | 426 | 34.0 | AA |
Puntuaciones de benchmarks (LLM Stats)
(LLM Stats (zeroeval))Agents
Finance Agent v2
31.0%
Chat
Tau2 Airline
63.6%Aut.
Communication
Tau2 Retail
83.2%Aut.
Tau2 Telecom
83.0%Aut.
Language
MMMLU
83.0%Aut.
Math
AIME 2025
80.7%Aut.
Multimodal
OSWorld
50.7%Aut.
Reasoning
SWE-Bench Verified
73.3%Aut.
GPQANYU + Cohere + Anthropic (2023)
73.0%Aut.
Terminal-Bench
41.0%Aut.
Safety
Cybersecurity CTFs
46.9%Aut.
Vision
MMMU (validation)
73.2%Aut.
Índices de evaluación AA
(Artificial Analysis)Mmlu Pro(TIGER-Lab (Univ. of Waterloo, Toronto, CMU, 2024))80.0
Gpqa(NYU + Cohere + Anthropic (2023))64.6
Livecodebench(UC Berkeley + MIT + Cornell (2024))51.1
Lcr(Artificial Analysis)49.7
Ifbench(Google Research (2023))42.0
Math Index(Artificial Analysis)39.0
Aime 25(MAA (Mathematical Association of America))39.0
Tau2(Sierra + U Toronto + Vector Institute (2025))32.5
Terminalbench Hard(Stanford × Laude Institute (2026))27.3
Intelligence Index(Artificial Analysis)15.4
Hle(Center for AI Safety + Scale AI (2025))4.2
Puntuaciones por categoría LLM Stats
(LLM Stats (zeroeval))Language80
Math80
Communication80
Tool Calling80
Physics70
Reasoning70
Frontend Development70
Biology70
Chemistry70
Chat60
Multimodal60
Code60
Vision60
Safety50
General50
Healthcare50
Agents40
Long Context30
Finance30
Precios
Precio de entrada$1 / 1M tokens
Precio de salida$5 / 1M tokens
Precio mixto (3:1)$2 / 1M tokens
Precio de lectura caché$0.1 / 1M tokens
Precio de escritura caché$1.25 / 1M tokens
Velocidad
Tokens/seg91.3
Retraso del primer token0.50s
Tiempo hasta la respuesta0.50s
Ranking de Precios por Proveedor
Ranking de Precios por Proveedor
33 proveedores
Más barato: AnthropicMás caro: UnoRouter
ProveedorEntradaSalida
1AnthropicMás barato
$0
$0.00001
2DeepInfra
$0
$0.00001
3QiHang
$0.14
$0.71
4Xpersona
$0.6
$3.7
5Poe
$0.85
$4.3
6Jiekou.AI
$0.9
$4.5
7Cortecs
$0.996
$4.982
8302.AI
$1
$5
9NanoGPT
$1
$5
10Abacus
$1
$5
11OpenRouter
$1
$5
12ZenMux
$1
$5
13Kilo Gateway
$1
$5
14Cloudflare AI Gateway
$1
$5
15OpenCode Zen
$1
$5
16Helicone
$1
$5
17FrogBot
$1
$5
18Azure Cognitive Services
$1
$5
19Vertex (Anthropic)
$1
$5
20Requesty
$1
$5
21Vercel AI Gateway
$1
$5
22DevPass (LLM Gateway)
$1
$5
23Vertex
$1
$5
24Azure
$1
$5
25OrcaRouter
$1
$5
26FreeModel
$1
$5
27Neon
$1
$5
28Pioneer
$1
$5
29DaoXE
$1
$5
30Ofox
$1
$5
31AIHubMix
$1.1
$5.5
32Opper
$1.1
$5.5
33UnoRouter
$1.2
$6
Comparar precios entre diferentes proveedores de API para este modelo.