Saltar al contenido principal

Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)

AnthropicClaude

Descripción

Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's generally available deployment of the same underlying weights as the restricted Claude Mythos 5 model. Anthropic positions the model as a new capability tier above Opus: Mythos 5 is the unsafeguarded trusted-access configuration, while Fable 5 adds production safeguards for public use. The system card reports that Mythos 5 is Anthropic's most capable model to date, with state-of-the-art results across software engineering, long-context agentic tasks, vision, knowledge work, healthcare, cyber, and life-sciences evaluations; Fable 5 matches the underlying model where safeguards do not trigger and behaves closer to Claude Opus 4.8 in safeguarded domains. Fable-specific results include SWE-Bench Verified 95.0%, SWE-Bench Pro 80.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1 84.3% mean reward with 20.9% of trials hitting a safety fallback, OSWorld-Verified 85.0%, FrontierCode Diamond 29.3%, FrontierCode Main 46.3%, GDPval-AA 1932 Elo, GDP.pdf 29.8%, Blueprint-Bench 2 38.6%, and AutomationBench 17.4%. Fable 5 uses classifiers for cybersecurity, biology and chemistry, and distillation attempts; in Claude client apps these requests fall back to the latest Claude Opus model, while the Messages API blocks by default unless developers implement or opt into fallback. Separate competitive-use safeguards target frontier LLM development work and are estimated by Anthropic to affect about 0.03% of traffic. The model was trained on a proprietary mix of public web data, public and private datasets, and synthetic data. Anthropic prices Fable 5 at $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens, and exposes it through the Claude API as `claude-fable-5`.

Fecha de lanzamiento
2026-06-09
Parámetros
Longitud del contexto
1.0M
Modalidades
image, pdf, text

Radar de capacidades

62
general
62
coding
93
reasoning
73
scienceest.
100
agents
80
multimodal

Science usa un proxy de razonamiento cuando los benchmarks científicos dedicados no están disponibles.

Rankings

Dominio#PosiciónPuntuaciónFuente
Ranking de codificación1
98.0
AA
Ranking general1
93.0
AA
Ciencia1
99.0
AA

Puntuaciones de benchmarks (LLM Stats)

Agents

GDPval-AA1932.00 / 3000Aut.
OSWorld-Verified85.0%Aut.
Terminal-Bench 2.184.3%Aut.
SWE-Bench Pro80.0%Aut.
ExploitBench78.0%Aut.
FrontierCode46.3%Aut.
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%Aut.
AutomationBench17.4%Aut.
Legal Agent Benchmark13.3%Aut.

Biology

BioMysteryBench46.1%Aut.

Code

SWE-Bench Verified95.0%Aut.

General

GDP.pdf29.8%Aut.

Healthcare

HealthBench Professional66.0%Aut.

Math

Humanity's Last Exam64.5%Aut.

Índices de evaluación AA

Intelligence Index
64.9
Coding Index
62.0
Tau2
1.0
Gpqa
0.9
Lcr
0.7
Ifbench
0.6
Terminalbench Hard
0.6
Scicode
0.6
Hle
0.5

Puntuaciones por categoría LLM Stats

Finance
100
Legal
100
General
100
Agents
100
Reasoning
100
Frontend Development
90
Code
90
Multimodal
80
Healthcare
70
Vision
70
Math
60

Precios

Precio de entrada$10 / 1M tokens
Precio de salida$50 / 1M tokens
Precio mixto (3:1)$20 / 1M tokens
Precio de lectura caché$1 / 1M tokens
Precio de escritura caché$12.5 / 1M tokens

Velocidad

Tokens/seg71.4
Retraso del primer token66.09s
Tiempo hasta la respuesta66.09s

Ranking de Precios por Proveedor

Ranking de Precios por Proveedor

6 proveedores

Más barato: AnthropicMás caro: Vercel AI Gateway
ProveedorEntradaSalida
1AnthropicPRINCIPAL
$10
$50
2OpenRouter
$10
$50
3ZenMux
$10
$50
4Cloudflare AI Gateway
$10
$50
5Amazon Bedrock
$10
$50
6Vercel AI Gateway
$10
$50

Comparar precios entre diferentes proveedores de API para este modelo.

Fuentes externas