GPT-5.6 Luna (max)
OpenAIGPTProprietary
Descripción
GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most cost-efficient tier of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, designed for cost-sensitive, high-volume workloads. It brings strong capability at OpenAI's lowest GPT-5.6 price, supports max reasoning effort, and has a 1.05M-token context window.
Fecha de lanzamiento
2026-07-09
Parámetros
—
Longitud del contexto
1.1M
Modalidades
image, pdf, text
Radar de capacidades
50
general
68
coding
91
reasoning
67
science
70
agents
85
multimodal
Rankings
| Dominio | #Posición | Puntuación | Fuente |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacidad agéntica | 50 | 52.0 | LS |
| Ranking de codificación | 20 | 92.0 | AA |
| Ranking general | 34 | 83.0 | AA |
| Ranking multimodal | 70 | 43.0 | LS |
| Ciencia | 38 | 85.0 | AA |
Puntuaciones de benchmarks (LLM Stats)
(LLM Stats (zeroeval))Agents
Connectors
99.9%Aut.
Search and Function-Calling
89.7%Aut.
Capture-the-Flag Challenges (Internal)
85.2%Aut.
Toolathlon
53.4%Aut.
LifeSciBench
51.2%Aut.
Internal Research Debugging Evaluation
50.8%Aut.
Agents' Last Exam
50.3%Aut.
SEC-bench Pro
48.9%Aut.
RSI Index
41.9%Aut.
Big Finance Bench
36.0%Aut.
Management Consulting Tasks (Internal)
35.4%Aut.
PostTrainBench Lite
29.6%Aut.
KernelGen 1P
22.4%Aut.
AutomationBench
14.9%Aut.
ExploitGym
12.4%Aut.
GeneBench-Pro
10.8%Aut.
NanoGPT
1.7%Aut.
Code
BenchCAD (with Python tool)
73.9%Aut.
DeepSWE
67.2%Aut.
DeepSWE 1.1
67.0%
BenchCAD
63.1%Aut.
ExploitBench
33.2%Aut.
General
Artificial Analysis
51.0%
GDP.pdf
22.7%Aut.
Healthcare
HealthBench Consensus
95.1%Aut.
HealthBench
55.8%Aut.
HealthBench Professional
55.7%Aut.
HealthBench Hard
32.0%Aut.
Long Context
MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M)
41.3%Aut.
MRCR v2 (8-needle)
41.3%Aut.
Math
FrontierMath
78.6%Aut.
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2)
58.5%Aut.
Multimodal
OSWorld 2.0
45.6%Aut.
Reasoning
GPQANYU + Cohere + Anthropic (2023)
92.3%Aut.
Terminal-Bench 2.1
84.7%Aut.
BrowseCompOpenAI (2025)
83.3%Aut.
Graphwalks BFS >128k
81.3%Aut.
SWE-Bench ProPrinceton NLP (2024)
62.7%Aut.
Graphwalks BFS 1M
51.2%Aut.
FrontierCode 1.1
39.8%
MedChemBench (Internal)
30.4%Aut.
ARC-AGI-3
0.2%Aut.
Vision
MMMU-Pro (with tools)
79.5%Aut.
MMMU-Pro
78.4%Aut.
Índices de evaluación AA
(Artificial Analysis)Coding Index(Artificial Analysis)71.4
Intelligence Index(Artificial Analysis)52.3
Gpqa(NYU + Cohere + Anthropic (2023))0.9
Terminalbench V2 10.8
Lcr(Artificial Analysis)0.8
Scicode(UIUC + Argonne National Lab (2024))0.5
Hle(Center for AI Safety + Scale AI (2025))0.4
Tau Banking0.3
Puntuaciones por categoría LLM Stats
(LLM Stats (zeroeval))Physics90
Biology90
Chemistry90
Search80
Math70
Spatial Reasoning70
Tool Calling70
Multimodal60
Vision60
Long Context50
Reasoning50
General50
Healthcare50
Agents50
Code50
Safety40
Finance40
Science30
Systems20
Precios
Precio de entrada$0.2 / 1M tokens
Precio de salida$1.2 / 1M tokens
Precio mixto (3:1)$0.45 / 1M tokens
Precio de lectura caché$0.02 / 1M tokens
Precio de escritura caché$0.25 / 1M tokens
Velocidad
Tokens/seg132.4
Retraso del primer token86.96s
Tiempo hasta la respuesta86.96s
Ranking de Precios por Proveedor
Ranking de Precios por Proveedor
2 proveedores
Más barato: OpenAIMás caro: Neon
ProveedorEntradaSalida
1OpenAIMás barato
$0
$0
2Neon
$1
$6
Comparar precios entre diferentes proveedores de API para este modelo.