Saltar al contenido principal

Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)

SpaceXAIGrokProprietary

Descripción

Grok 4.1 Thinking (code name: quasarflux) is the reasoning variant of Grok 4.1, bringing significant improvements to the real-world usability of Grok. The model is exceptionally capable in creative, emotional, and collaborative interactions. It is more perceptive to nuanced intent, compelling to speak with, and coherent in personality, while fully retaining the razor-sharp intelligence and reliability of its predecessors. Grok 4.1 Thinking uses thinking tokens for deeper reasoning, achieving state-of-the-art performance on blind human preference evaluations. The model features reduced hallucinations compared to previous versions, with significant improvements in factual accuracy for information-seeking prompts. To achieve this, xAI used large scale reinforcement learning infrastructure to optimize style, personality, helpfulness, and alignment, developing new methods that use frontier agentic reasoning models as reward models to autonomously evaluate and iterate on responses at scale. Grok 4.1 Thinking includes comprehensive safety mitigations including refusal training, input filters for restricted knowledge, and adversarial robustness measures. The model demonstrates strong refusal rates on harmful queries (7% answer rate on chat refusals, 14% on agentic refusals) and improved honesty training to reduce deception.

Fecha de lanzamiento
2025-11-19
Parámetros
—
Longitud del contexto
—
Modalidades
image, text

Radar de capacidades

40
general
82
coding
89
reasoning
65
science
87
agents
80
multimodal

Rankings

Dominio#PosiciónPuntuaciónFuente
Ranking de codificación176
70.0
AA
Ranking general140
62.0
AA
Ciencia200
59.0
AA

Puntuaciones de benchmarks (LLM Stats)

(LLM Stats (zeroeval))

Biology

BioLP-Bench37.0%Aut.

Chat

EQ-Bench1586.00 / 2000Aut.
LMArena Text Leaderboard1483.00 / 2000Aut.

Creativity

Creative Writing v386.1%Aut.

Safety

WMDP84.0%Aut.
ProtocolQA79.0%Aut.
Virology Capabilities Test61.0%Aut.
MASK51.0%Aut.
CloningScenarios46.0%Aut.
CyBench39.0%Aut.
FigQA34.0%Aut.

Índices de evaluación AA

(Artificial Analysis)
Tau2(Sierra + U Toronto + Vector Institute (2025))
93.3
Aime 25(MAA (Mathematical Association of America))
89.3
Math Index(Artificial Analysis)
89.3
Mmlu Pro(TIGER-Lab (Univ. of Waterloo, Toronto, CMU, 2024))
85.4
Gpqa(NYU + Cohere + Anthropic (2023))
85.3
Livecodebench(UC Berkeley + MIT + Cornell (2024))
82.2
Lcr(Artificial Analysis)
74.0
Ifbench(Google Research (2023))
52.7
Terminalbench Hard(Stanford × Laude Institute (2026))
24.2
Intelligence Index(Artificial Analysis)
20.4
Hle(Center for AI Safety + Scale AI (2025))
19.3

Puntuaciones por categoría LLM Stats

(LLM Stats (zeroeval))
Creativity
90
Writing
90
General
60
Safety
30
Healthcare
30
Vision
30

Precios

Precio de entradaGratis
Precio de salidaGratis
Precio mixto (3:1)Gratis

Velocidad

Tokens/seg0.0
Retraso del primer token0.00s
Tiempo hasta la respuesta0.00s

Ranking de Precios por Proveedor

Ranking de Precios por Proveedor

6 proveedores

Más barato: Jiekou.AIMás caro: Azure
ProveedorEntradaSalida
1Jiekou.AIMás barato
$0.18
$0.45
2Helicone
$0.2
$0.5
3302.AI
$0.2
$0.5
4FrogBot
$0.2
$0.5
5DevPass (LLM Gateway)
$0.2
$0.5
6Azure
$0.2
$0.5

Comparar precios entre diferentes proveedores de API para este modelo.

Fuentes externas