Saltar al contenido principal

Claude Fable 5

AnthropicClaudeProprietary

Descripción

Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's generally available deployment of the same underlying weights as the restricted Claude Mythos 5 model. Anthropic positions the model as a new capability tier above Opus: Mythos 5 is the unsafeguarded trusted-access configuration, while Fable 5 adds production safeguards for public use. The system card reports that Mythos 5 is Anthropic's most capable model to date, with state-of-the-art results across software engineering, long-context agentic tasks, vision, knowledge work, healthcare, cyber, and life-sciences evaluations; Fable 5 matches the underlying model where safeguards do not trigger and behaves closer to Claude Opus 4.8 in safeguarded domains. Fable-specific results include SWE-Bench Verified 95.0%, SWE-Bench Pro 80.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1 84.3% mean reward with 20.9% of trials hitting a safety fallback, OSWorld-Verified 85.0%, FrontierCode Diamond 29.3%, FrontierCode Main 46.3%, GDPval-AA 1932 Elo, GDP.pdf 29.8%, Blueprint-Bench 2 38.6%, and AutomationBench 17.4%. Fable 5 uses classifiers for cybersecurity, biology and chemistry, and distillation attempts; in Claude client apps these requests fall back to the latest Claude Opus model, while the Messages API blocks by default unless developers implement or opt into fallback. Separate competitive-use safeguards target frontier LLM development work and are estimated by Anthropic to affect about 0.03% of traffic. The model was trained on a proprietary mix of public web data, public and private datasets, and synthetic data. Anthropic prices Fable 5 at $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens, and exposes it through the Claude API as `claude-fable-5`.

Fecha de lanzamiento
2026-06-09
Parámetros
Longitud del contexto
1.0M
Modalidades
image, pdf, text

Radar de capacidades

100
general
70
coding
70
reasoning
60
scienceest.
50
agents
70
multimodal

Science usa un proxy de razonamiento cuando los benchmarks científicos dedicados no están disponibles.

Rankings

Dominio#PosiciónPuntuaciónFuente
Capacidad agéntica3
82.0
LS
Razonamiento matemático3
96.0
LB
Razonamiento6
90.0
LB

Puntuaciones de benchmarks (LLM Stats)

(LLM Stats (zeroeval))

Agents

GDPval-AA1815.00 / 3000
FrontierSWE90.0%
OSWorld-Verified85.0%Aut.
Terminal-Bench 2.184.3%Aut.
SWE-Bench ProPrinceton NLP (2024)80.0%Aut.
ExploitBench78.0%Aut.
DeepSWE 1.170.0%
Finance Agent v256.3%
FrontierCode 1.153.5%
FrontierCode46.3%Aut.
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%Aut.
AutomationBench17.4%Aut.
Legal Agent Benchmark13.3%Aut.

Biology

BioMysteryBench46.1%Aut.

Code

SWE-Bench Verified95.0%Aut.

General

LiveBench78.3%
GDP.pdf29.8%Aut.

Healthcare

HealthBench Professional66.0%Aut.

Math

Humanity's Last Exam64.5%Aut.

Índices de evaluación AA

(Artificial Analysis)

No hay datos de evaluación AA disponibles

Puntuaciones por categoría LLM Stats

(LLM Stats (zeroeval))
Finance
100
Legal
100
Reasoning
100
Agents
100
General
100
Frontend Development
90
Safety
80
Math
70
Healthcare
70
Code
70
Multimodal
60
Vision
60
Tool Calling
50

Precios

Precio de entrada$0.00001 / 1M tokens
Precio de salida$0.00005 / 1M tokens
Precio mixto (3:1)$0.00002 / 1M tokens
Precio de lectura caché$1 / 1M tokens
Precio de escritura caché$12.5 / 1M tokens

Velocidad

No hay datos de velocidad disponibles

Ranking de Precios por Proveedor

Ranking de Precios por Proveedor

11 proveedores

Más barato: AnthropicMás caro: Venice AI
ProveedorEntradaSalida
1AnthropicPRINCIPAL
$0.00001
$0.00005
2Xpersona
$3
$18.5
3Abacus
$10
$50
4GitHub Copilot
$10
$50
5OpenCode Zen
$10
$50
6LLM Gateway
$10
$50
7Azure
$10
$50
8FreeModel
$10
$50
9Modelis
$10
$50
10AIHubMix
$11
$55
11Venice AI
$12
$60

Comparar precios entre diferentes proveedores de API para este modelo.

Fuentes externas