Saltar al contenido principal

Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)

AlibabaQwenOpen WeightApache 2.0 · Uso Comercial

Descripción

Qwen3.6-27B is a dense 27-billion-parameter multimodal model in the Qwen3.6 series, supporting both vision-language thinking and non-thinking modes in a single unified checkpoint. The 64-layer language model uses a hybrid layout of 16 repeats of (3 × Gated DeltaNet → FFN, 1 × Gated Attention → FFN) with hidden dim 5120 and FFN intermediate 17408 — Gated DeltaNet has 48/16 heads for V/QK (head dim 128) and Gated Attention has 24/4 heads for Q/KV (head dim 256). It supports a native 262,144-token context extensible to ~1,010,000 via YaRN and is trained with multi-token prediction. The release delivers flagship-level agentic coding, surpassing the previous-generation open-source flagship Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (397B total / 17B active) on every major coding benchmark including SWE-bench Verified (77.2), SWE-bench Pro (53.5), Terminal-Bench 2.0 (59.3), and SkillsBench (48.2), and reaches 87.8 on GPQA Diamond. Released as open weights under Apache 2.0; accessible via Qwen Studio with the Alibaba Cloud Model Studio API coming soon.

Fecha de lanzamiento
2026-04-22
Parámetros
27.8B
Longitud del contexto
262K
Modalidades
audio, image, text, video

Radar de capacidades

22
general
52
coding
84
reasoning
57
science
60
agents
80
multimodal

Rankings

Dominio#PosiciónPuntuaciónFuente
Capacidad agéntica101
35.0
LS
Ranking de codificación191
68.0
AA
Ranking general153
60.0
AA
Ranking multimodal14
65.0
LS
Ciencia181
61.0
AA

Puntuaciones de benchmarks (LLM Stats)

(LLM Stats (zeroeval))

Agents

AndroidWorld70.3%Aut.

Code

QwenWebBench1487.00 / 2000Aut.
Claw-Eval60.6%Aut.
ZClawBench53.4%Aut.
SkillsBench48.2%Aut.
NL2Repo36.2%Aut.

General

C-Eval91.4%Aut.

Language

MMLU-Redux93.5%Aut.
MMLU-Pro86.2%Aut.

Math

AIME 202694.1%Aut.
HMMT 202593.8%Aut.
HMMT2590.7%Aut.
MathVista-Mini87.4%Aut.
DynaMath85.6%Aut.
HMMT Feb 2684.3%Aut.
IMO-AnswerBench80.8%Aut.

Multimodal

VideoMMMU84.4%Aut.
MMMU82.9%Aut.

Reasoning

GPQANYU + Cohere + Anthropic (2023)87.8%Aut.
LiveCodeBench v683.9%Aut.
CharXiv-R78.4%Aut.
SWE-Bench Verified77.2%Aut.
SWE-bench Multilingual71.3%Aut.
SuperGPQA66.0%Aut.
Terminal-Bench 2.0Stanford × Laude Institute (2026)59.3%Aut.
SWE-Bench ProPrinceton NLP (2024)53.5%Aut.
Humanity's Last Exam24.0%Aut.

Video

MLVU86.6%Aut.

Vision

CountBench0.98 / 100Aut.
VLMsAreBlind97.0%Aut.
V*94.7%Aut.
RefCOCO-avg0.93 / 100Aut.
MMBench-V1.192.3%Aut.
OCRBench89.4%Aut.
VideoMME w sub.87.7%Aut.
EmbSpatialBench0.85 / 100Aut.
RealWorldQA84.1%Aut.
MMStar81.4%Aut.
CC-OCR81.2%Aut.
MMMU-Pro75.8%Aut.
MVBench75.5%Aut.
RefSpatialBench0.70 / 100Aut.
ERQA62.5%Aut.
SimpleVQA0.56 / 100Aut.

Índices de evaluación AA

(Artificial Analysis)
Tau2(Sierra + U Toronto + Vector Institute (2025))
94.2
Gpqa(NYU + Cohere + Anthropic (2023))
84.2
Lcr(Artificial Analysis)
77.3
Ifbench(Google Research (2023))
67.6
Terminalbench V2 1
60.7
Coding Index(Artificial Analysis)
53.7
Scicode(UIUC + Argonne National Lab (2024))
42.8
Terminalbench Hard(Stanford × Laude Institute (2026))
34.8
Hle(Center for AI Safety + Scale AI (2025))
23.1
Intelligence Index(Artificial Analysis)
21.4
Tau Banking
16.7
Terminalbench V4 0
0.0

Puntuaciones por categoría LLM Stats

(LLM Stats (zeroeval))
Language
90
Long Context
90
Biology
90
Legal
80
Math
80
Multimodal
80
Physics
80
Reasoning
80
Spatial Reasoning
80
Structured Output
80
Embodied
80
Finance
80
Frontend Development
80
General
80
Grounding
80
Healthcare
80
Chemistry
80
Text-to-image
80
Video
80
Vision
80
Image To Text
70
Economics
70
Code
60
Tool Calling
60
Agents
50

Precios

Precio de entrada$0.6 / 1M tokens
Precio de salida$3.6 / 1M tokens
Precio mixto (3:1)$1.35 / 1M tokens

Velocidad

Tokens/seg0.0
Retraso del primer token0.00s
Tiempo hasta la respuesta0.00s

Ranking de Precios por Proveedor

Ranking de Precios por Proveedor

5 proveedores

Más barato: DeepInfraMás caro: Alibaba
ProveedorEntradaSalida
1DeepInfraMás barato
$0
$0
2Novita
$0
$0
3Venice AI
$0.325
$3.25
4EmpirioLabs AI
$0.41256
$2.47538
5AlibabaPRINCIPAL
$0.6
$3.6

Comparar precios entre diferentes proveedores de API para este modelo.

Fuentes externas