Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)
Description
Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's generally available deployment of the same underlying weights as the restricted Claude Mythos 5 model. Anthropic positions the model as a new capability tier above Opus: Mythos 5 is the unsafeguarded trusted-access configuration, while Fable 5 adds production safeguards for public use. The system card reports that Mythos 5 is Anthropic's most capable model to date, with state-of-the-art results across software engineering, long-context agentic tasks, vision, knowledge work, healthcare, cyber, and life-sciences evaluations; Fable 5 matches the underlying model where safeguards do not trigger and behaves closer to Claude Opus 4.8 in safeguarded domains. Fable-specific results include SWE-Bench Verified 95.0%, SWE-Bench Pro 80.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1 84.3% mean reward with 20.9% of trials hitting a safety fallback, OSWorld-Verified 85.0%, FrontierCode Diamond 29.3%, FrontierCode Main 46.3%, GDPval-AA 1932 Elo, GDP.pdf 29.8%, Blueprint-Bench 2 38.6%, and AutomationBench 17.4%. Fable 5 uses classifiers for cybersecurity, biology and chemistry, and distillation attempts; in Claude client apps these requests fall back to the latest Claude Opus model, while the Messages API blocks by default unless developers implement or opt into fallback. Separate competitive-use safeguards target frontier LLM development work and are estimated by Anthropic to affect about 0.03% of traffic. The model was trained on a proprietary mix of public web data, public and private datasets, and synthetic data. Anthropic prices Fable 5 at $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens, and exposes it through the Claude API as `claude-fable-5`.
Radar de capacités
Science utilise un proxy de raisonnement lorsque les benchmarks scientifiques dédiés ne sont pas disponibles.
Classements
| Domaine | #Rang | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classement codage | 1 | 98.0 | AA |
| Classement général | 1 | 93.0 | AA |
| Science | 1 | 99.0 | AA |
Scores de benchmarks (LLM Stats)
Agents
Biology
Code
General
Healthcare
Math
Indices d'évaluation AA
Scores par catégorie LLM Stats
Tarification
Vitesse
Classement des Prix par Fournisseur
Classement des Prix par Fournisseur
6 fournisseurs
Comparer les prix entre différents fournisseurs API pour ce modèle.